📘 Chapter 15: Parallels between Main Group & Organometallic Chemistry
Handwritten-style notes · Exam-focused · JEE Advanced · NEET · IIT-JAM · GATE · CSIR-NET · TGT/PGT · BITSAT
🎯 JEE Advanced
🧪 CSIR-NET
⚗️ IIT-JAM
🔬 GATE
📚 TGT/PGT
🏫 NEET
⚡ 15.1 — Main Group Parallels with Binary Carbonyl Complexes
🔑 Core Concept: Species needing the same number of electrons to reach a filled-shell (octet or 18e⁻) config are called electronically equivalent species.
📊 Key Table 1 — Electronically Equivalent Species
| Electrons Short of Filled Shell | Main Group | Metal Carbonyl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cl, Br, I | Mn(CO)₅, Co(CO)₄ |
| 2 | S | Fe(CO)₄, Os(CO)₄ |
| 3 | P | Co(CO)₃, Ir(CO)₃ |
💡 Trick to Remember:
Halogen (7e⁻ main group) ↔ 17e⁻ metal carbonyl
S group-16 (6e⁻) ↔ 16e⁻ metal carbonyl
P group-15 (5e⁻) ↔ 15e⁻ metal carbonyl
Halogen (7e⁻ main group) ↔ 17e⁻ metal carbonyl
S group-16 (6e⁻) ↔ 16e⁻ metal carbonyl
P group-15 (5e⁻) ↔ 15e⁻ metal carbonyl
📊 Table 15.1 — Parallels: Cl vs Co(CO)₄
| Property | Halogen (Cl) | Co(CO)₄ |
|---|---|---|
| 1– ion | Cl⁻ | [Co(CO)₄]⁻ |
| Neutral dimer | Cl₂ | [Co(CO)₄]₂ |
| Hydrohalic acid (strong) | HCl | HCo(CO)₄ |
| Interhalogen-type | BrCl from Br₂+Cl₂ | ICo(CO)₄ from I₂+[Co(CO)₄]₂ |
| Heavy metal precipitate | AgCl | AgCo(CO)₄ |
| Addition to alkene | Cl₂ + H₂C=CH₂ → ClCH₂CH₂Cl | [Co(CO)₄]₂ + F₂C=CF₂ → product |
| Disproportionation by Lewis base | Cl₂ + N(CH₃)₃ → [ClN(CH₃)₃]Cl | [Co(CO)₄]₂ + piperidine → ionic product |
🔴 Exam Highlight: Co(CO)₄ and other 17e⁻ binary carbonyls are called PSEUDOHALOGENS — this term is directly asked in CSIR-NET & GATE!
📊 Table 15.2 — Parallels: S vs Fe(CO)₄
| Property | Sulfur | Fe(CO)₄ |
|---|---|---|
| 2– ion | S²⁻ | [Fe(CO)₄]²⁻ |
| Neutral compound | S₈ | Fe₂(CO)₉, [Fe(CO)₄]₃ |
| Hydride | H₂S (pKa₁=7.24, pKa₂=14.92) | H₂Fe(CO)₄ (pKa₁=4.44, pKa₂=14) |
| Phosphine adduct | Ph₃PS | Ph₃PFe(CO)₄ |
| Ethylene complex | Ethylene sulfide (3-membered ring) | Fe(CO)₄–ethylene π-complex |
💡 Note: P and Ir(CO)₃ both form tetrahedral tetramers — P₄ and [Ir(CO)₃]₄ — a beautiful analogy!
Also: Co(CO)₃ can replace P atoms in P₄ tetrahedron. So P₄, P₃Co(CO)₃, etc. are all known.
Also: Co(CO)₃ can replace P atoms in P₄ tetrahedron. So P₄, P₃Co(CO)₃, etc. are all known.
⚠️ Limitation of Electronic Equivalency: Organometallic analogs of IF₇, XeF₄ (expanded octet) don't exist. Also, CO loss is very common in metal carbonyls but NOT in main group — so chemistry can differ significantly.
🧩 15.2 — The Isolobal Analogy (⭐ Most Important for All Exams)
📖 Hoffmann's Definition (Nobel 1981):
Two fragments are ISOLOBAL if they have the same:
Two fragments are ISOLOBAL if they have the same:
- Number of frontier orbitals
- Symmetry properties of frontier orbitals
- Approximate energy of frontier orbitals
- Number of electrons in those orbitals
🧱 Building Isolobal Fragments from CH₄ & ML₆
- CH₄ (sp³) & ML₆ (d²sp³) — both 0 vertices missing, 0e⁻ short → parent closed-shell
- Remove 1 H / 1 L → CH₃ (7e⁻) ↔ ML₅ e.g. Mn(CO)₅ (17e⁻)
- Remove 2 → CH₂ (6e⁻) ↔ ML₄ e.g. Fe(CO)₄ (16e⁻)
- Remove 3 → CH (5e⁻) ↔ ML₃ e.g. Co(CO)₃ (15e⁻)
📊 Table 15.3 — Isolobal Fragment Summary (Most Asked!)
| Type | CH₄ | CH₃ | CH₂ | CH | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral MCs | Cr(CO)₆ | Mn(CO)₅ | Fe(CO)₄ | Co(CO)₃ | Ni(CO)₂ |
| Cationic MCs | — | [Mn(CO)₆]⁺ | [Fe(CO)₅]⁺ | [Co(CO)₄]⁺ | [Ni(CO)₃]⁺ |
| Cp Complexes | — | CpMn(CO)₃ | CpFe(CO)₂ | CpCo(CO) | CpNi |
| Anionic (from CH₃⁻) | — | Fe(CO)₅ | Co(CO)₄ | Ni(CO)₃ | — |
| Cationic (from CH₃⁺) | V(CO)₆ | Cr(CO)₅ | Mn(CO)₄ | Fe(CO)₃ | — |
📐 Step-by-step to find isolobal organometallic fragment:
1. Count how many e⁻ short & how many vertices missing from CH₄
2. Same for ML₆ parent — both must match
3. Adjust charge: +1 charge ↔ 1 extra d-electron, –1 ↔ 1 fewer d-electron
1. Count how many e⁻ short & how many vertices missing from CH₄
2. Same for ML₆ parent — both must match
3. Adjust charge: +1 charge ↔ 1 extra d-electron, –1 ↔ 1 fewer d-electron
🌟 Extensions of the Isolobal Analogy
- Extension 1: Isoelectronic fragments with same coordination number are isolobal. e.g. Mn(CO)₅ ↔ Re(CO)₅ ↔ [Fe(CO)₅]⁺ ↔ [Cr(CO)₅]⁻ — all isolobal with CH₃
- Extension 2: Gain/loss of e⁻ gives isolobal fragments. e.g. Cr(CO)₅, Mo(CO)₅, W(CO)₅ all isolobal with CH₃⁺
- Extension 3: PR₃, NCR, Cl⁻ — all 2e⁻ donors — treated same as CO. e.g. Mn(CO)₅ ↔ Mn(PR₃)₅ ↔ [MnCl₅]⁵⁻
- Extension 4: η⁵-C₅H₅ and η⁶-C₆H₆ = 6e⁻ donors occupying 3 coord sites. So (η⁵-Cp)Fe(CO)₂ ↔ Mn(CO)₅ (both 17e⁻)
- Extension 5: Octahedral MLₙ (dˣ) ↔ Square-planar MLₙ₋₂ (dˣ⁺²). e.g. Cr(CO)₅ (d⁶ oct) ↔ [PtCl₃]⁻ (d⁸ sq-pl)
✅ Solved Example 15.1 — Find isolobal organometallic for CH₂⁺
Q: Propose organometallic fragments isolobal with CH₂⁺
Solution:
• CH₂⁺ = 2 ligands short + 3e⁻ short (6e⁻ – 3 = fragment with 5e⁻, cation)
• Octahedral fragment: ML₄ (2 vertices short), 15 electrons = Mn(CO)₄ (d⁷ Mn + 4×2CO = 7+8=15 ✓)
• Vary charge: d⁸ → [Fe(CO)₄]⁺ ; d⁶ → [Cr(CO)₄]⁻
Answer: Mn(CO)₄, [Fe(CO)₄]⁺, [Cr(CO)₄]⁻
Solution:
• CH₂⁺ = 2 ligands short + 3e⁻ short (6e⁻ – 3 = fragment with 5e⁻, cation)
• Octahedral fragment: ML₄ (2 vertices short), 15 electrons = Mn(CO)₄ (d⁷ Mn + 4×2CO = 7+8=15 ✓)
• Vary charge: d⁸ → [Fe(CO)₄]⁺ ; d⁶ → [Cr(CO)₄]⁻
Answer: Mn(CO)₄, [Fe(CO)₄]⁺, [Cr(CO)₄]⁻
📊 Table 15.4 — Isolobal Fragments from Different Polyhedra
| Organic Fragment | CN=5 parent | CN=6 parent | CN=7 parent | Valence e⁻ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH₃ | d⁹-ML₄ | d⁷-ML₅ | d⁵-ML₆ | 17 |
| CH₂ | d¹⁰-ML₃ | d⁸-ML₄ | d⁶-ML₅ | 16 |
| CH | d⁹-ML₃ | d⁷-ML₄ | d⁵-ML₅ | 15 |
💡 Real Applications of Isolobal:
- CH≡CH (two CH) → can replace by Co(CO)₃ + Co(CO)₃ → (OC)₃Co-Co(CO)₃
- C₃H₆ (cyclopropane) ↔ Os₃(CO)₁₂ (triangle of Os)
- AuPPh₃ behaves like H — both bridge triosmium clusters identically!
- P₅⁻ is isolobal with C₅H₅⁻ → metallocenes with P₅ rings exist! e.g. (η⁵-C₅Me₅)Fe(η⁵-P₅)
- Carbon-free metallocene: [(η⁵-P₅)₂Ti]²⁻ prepared from Ti(naphthalene)₂²⁻ + P₄
✅ Solved Example 15.2
CH₃ is isolobal with 17e⁻ Zn(η⁵-C₅Me₅) (Extension 4)
CH₂ is isolobal with 16e⁻ Ir(PPh₃)₂(CS)Cl (start with 16e⁻ [Ir(CO)₄]⁺, substitute PPh₃, Cl⁻, CS for CO)
→ These isolobal pairs are used to synthesize real compounds (Figure 15.6 in textbook):
CH₂ is isolobal with 16e⁻ Ir(PPh₃)₂(CS)Cl (start with 16e⁻ [Ir(CO)₄]⁺, substitute PPh₃, Cl⁻, CS for CO)
→ These isolobal pairs are used to synthesize real compounds (Figure 15.6 in textbook):
- Pt[Ir(PPh₃)₂(CS)Cl]₂ — analog of cyclopropane
- Zn₃ clusters — analog of CH₃ trimers
🔗 15.3 — Metal–Metal Bonds (⭐ Very Important for GATE/CSIR-NET/IIT-JAM)
Historical Timeline:
- 1935: K₃W₂Cl₉ — first direct M–M bond evidence (W–W = 240 pm vs 275 pm in W metal)
- 1963: [Re₃Cl₁₂]³⁻ crystal structure — Re–Re = 248 pm
- 1964: [Re₂Cl₈]²⁻ — first quadruple bond (Re–Re = 224 pm)
- 2005: Power's dimeric Cr(I) complex — first quintuple bond (Cr–Cr = 183.5 pm)
- 2009: Shortest ever M–M bond: Cr–Cr = 172.9 pm (guanidinate ligand)
⚛️ How Quadruple Bond Forms
d-orbital interactions in M₂ (z-axis = internuclear axis):
1. dz² + dz² → σ bond (strongest overlap)
2. dxz + dxz & dyz + dyz → 2 π bonds
3. dxy + dxy → δ bond (weakest, 4-region overlap)
4. dx²-y² + dx²-y² → used in σ bonding with ligands (in M₂L₈ complexes)
Bond order = σ + 2π + δ = 1+2+1 = 4 (quadruple!)
MO energy order: σ < π < δ < δ* < π* < σ*
1. dz² + dz² → σ bond (strongest overlap)
2. dxz + dxz & dyz + dyz → 2 π bonds
3. dxy + dxy → δ bond (weakest, 4-region overlap)
4. dx²-y² + dx²-y² → used in σ bonding with ligands (in M₂L₈ complexes)
Bond order = σ + 2π + δ = 1+2+1 = 4 (quadruple!)
MO energy order: σ < π < δ < δ* < π* < σ*
[Re₂Cl₈]²⁻ Analysis:
• Re(III) → d⁴ each → 8 d-electrons total
• Fill: σ(2e) + π(4e) + δ(2e) = bond order 4
• Color: Royal Blue (δ→δ* transition in visible region)
• Geometry: eclipsed D₄ₕ — maintained by weak δ bond
• Compare: [Mo₂Cl₈]⁴⁻ = Bright Red
• Re(III) → d⁴ each → 8 d-electrons total
• Fill: σ(2e) + π(4e) + δ(2e) = bond order 4
• Color: Royal Blue (δ→δ* transition in visible region)
• Geometry: eclipsed D₄ₕ — maintained by weak δ bond
• Compare: [Mo₂Cl₈]⁴⁻ = Bright Red
💡 Why are quadruply bonded complexes COLORED?
δ–δ* energy gap = visible light range → absorption → color!
Main group triple bonds (N₂, CO) are colorless because π–π* gap = UV range.
δ–δ* energy gap = visible light range → absorption → color!
Main group triple bonds (N₂, CO) are colorless because π–π* gap = UV range.
📊 Table 15.5 — Effect of Oxidation on Re–Re Bond Distance
| Complex | d-electrons | Bond Order | Re Ox. State | Re–Re (pm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re₂Cl₄(PMe₂Ph)₄ | 10 | 3 | +2 | 224.1 |
| [Re₂Cl₄(PMe₂Ph)₄]⁺ | 9 | 3.5 | +2.5 | 221.8 |
| [Re₂Cl₄(PMe₂Ph)₄]²⁺ | 8 | 4 | +3 | 221.5 |
⚠️ Key Point: Oxidation removes δ* electrons → expect shorter bond, BUT d-orbital contraction at higher oxidation offsets this → very small change in distance (224→221.5 pm only!)
📏 Formal Shortness Ratio (FSR) — Very Important for CSIR-NET
| Bond | Multiple/Single ratio | Bond | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| C≡C | 0.783 | Cr≡≡≡≡Cr (quadruple) | 0.767 |
| N≡N | 0.786 | Mo≡≡≡≡Mo | 0.807 |
| Re≡≡≡≡Re | 0.848 | Cr (quintuple, 2009) | 0.729 |
Smaller FSR = shorter relative bond = stronger multiple bond. Cr–Cr quadruple bonds have SMALLEST FSR known!
🔵 Quintuple Bonds
- 2005 (Power): Dimeric Cr(I) with bulky terphenyl ligands → Cr–Cr = 183.5 pm → FSR = 0.774
- d¹ Cr(I) → 5 d-electrons → σ + 2π + 2δ potentially occupied
- 2007: Cr–Cr reduced to 180.3 pm
- 2008 (Tsai): 174.0 pm
- 2009 (Kempe): 172.9 pm (guanidinate ligand) — shortest M–M bond ever! FSR = 0.729
- Mo–Mo quintuple bonds also known: 201.9 & 201.6 pm
🔴 Controversy: Some calculations give bond order as low as 3.3 for "quintuple" Cr complexes. Trans-bent geometry in Power's complex reduces orbital overlap efficiency. Tsai & Kempe complexes lack trans-bent geometry → more direct d-orbital interactions.
🧊 15.4 — Cluster Compounds (⭐⭐ Most Numerically Asked in IIT-JAM/GATE)
📐 15.4.1 — Boranes (closo/nido/arachno)
Closo Boranes [BₙHₙ]²⁻: closed polyhedral cages, all triangular faces
• MO theory gives 2n+1 bonding MOs (n B–H + n+1 framework)
• B₆H₆²⁻ (Oh symmetry) = 7 framework bonding pairs = 26 valence electrons
• Framework orbitals: A₁g (central) + T₁u + T₂g types
• Described as spherically aromatic (3D delocalization!)
• MO theory gives 2n+1 bonding MOs (n B–H + n+1 framework)
• B₆H₆²⁻ (Oh symmetry) = 7 framework bonding pairs = 26 valence electrons
• Framework orbitals: A₁g (central) + T₁u + T₂g types
• Described as spherically aromatic (3D delocalization!)
📊 Table 15.6 — Framework Bonding Pairs in Closo Boranes
| Formula | Total Valence e⁻ pairs | A₁ framework pair | Other sym pairs | B–H pairs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B₆H₆²⁻ | 13 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| B₇H₇²⁻ | 15 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| BₙHₙ²⁻ | 2n+1 | 1 | n | n |
📊 Table 15.7 — Wade's Rules (Classification)
| Structure Type | Corners Occupied | Framework Bond Pairs | Empty Corners |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closo | n of n | n+1 | 0 |
| Nido | n–1 of n | n+1 | 1 |
| Arachno | n–2 of n | n+1 | 2 |
| Hypho | n–3 of n | n+1 | 3 |
| Klado | n–4 of n | n+1 | 4 |
💡 All types have SAME n+1 framework pairs for the same parent! Only empty corners differ.
🔢 Electron Counting Method for Boranes
Step 1: Each BH fragment → contributes 2 electrons to framework
Step 2: Each extra H (beyond BH) → contributes 1 electron to framework
Step 3: Charge → add its electrons
Step 4: Total framework electrons ÷ 2 = framework pairs → parent polyhedron has (pairs – 1) corners
Step 5: Compare boron atoms to parent corners → classify as closo/nido/arachno
Step 2: Each extra H (beyond BH) → contributes 1 electron to framework
Step 3: Charge → add its electrons
Step 4: Total framework electrons ÷ 2 = framework pairs → parent polyhedron has (pairs – 1) corners
Step 5: Compare boron atoms to parent corners → classify as closo/nido/arachno
✅ Solved Example 15.3 — Classify B₁₁H₁₃²⁻
Total valence e⁻ = 33+13+2 = 48
Step 1: 11 BH → 11×2 = 22 e⁻
Step 2: Extra H = 13–11 = 2 → 2 e⁻ (total: 24)
Step 3: charge = –2 → +2 e⁻ (total: 26 e⁻ = 13 pairs)
Step 4: Parent polyhedron corners = 13–1 = 12 (icosahedron)
Step 5: Only 11 B atoms → 1 corner missing → NIDO
Step 1: 11 BH → 11×2 = 22 e⁻
Step 2: Extra H = 13–11 = 2 → 2 e⁻ (total: 24)
Step 3: charge = –2 → +2 e⁻ (total: 26 e⁻ = 13 pairs)
Step 4: Parent polyhedron corners = 13–1 = 12 (icosahedron)
Step 5: Only 11 B atoms → 1 corner missing → NIDO
🚀 Quick Classification Trick (Easier Method!)
Subtract H⁺ ions to make (# H) = (# B), then check the charge:
• Charge = 2– → Closo
• Charge = 4– → Nido
• Charge = 6– → Arachno
• Charge = 8– → Hypho
• Charge = 2– → Closo
• Charge = 4– → Nido
• Charge = 6– → Arachno
• Charge = 8– → Hypho
✅ Solved Example 15.4
B₁₀H₁₄: B₁₀H₁₄ – 4H⁺ = B₁₀H₁₀⁴⁻ → Nido
B₂H₇⁻: B₂H₇⁻ – 5H⁺ = B₂H₂⁶⁻ → Arachno
B₈H₁₆: B₈H₁₆ – 8H⁺ = B₈H₈⁸⁻ → Hypho
B₂H₇⁻: B₂H₇⁻ – 5H⁺ = B₂H₂⁶⁻ → Arachno
B₈H₁₆: B₈H₁₆ – 8H⁺ = B₈H₈⁸⁻ → Hypho
📊 Table 15.8 — Electron Count & Classification Examples
| Parent vertices | Type | Boron atoms | Valence e⁻ | Framework pairs | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Closo | 6 | 26 | 7 | B₆H₆²⁻ |
| 6 | Nido | 5 | 24 | 7 | B₅H₉ |
| 6 | Arachno | 4 | 22 | 7 | B₄H₁₀ |
| 7 | Closo | 7 | 30 | 8 | B₇H₇²⁻ |
| 12 | Closo | 12 | 50 | 13 | B₁₂H₁₂²⁻ |
| 12 | Nido | 11 | 48 | 13 | B₁₁H₁₃²⁻ |
🧪 15.4.2 — Carboranes (Heteroboranes)
Key rule: CH⁺ is isoelectronic with BH
So replace C by BH → treat as borane → classify!
For classification: C in carborane → convert each C to BH, then apply borane rules.
So replace C by BH → treat as borane → classify!
For classification: C in carborane → convert each C to BH, then apply borane rules.
📊 Table 15.9 — Borane vs Carborane Formulas
| Type | Borane | Carborane |
|---|---|---|
| Closo | BₙHₙ²⁻ | C₂Bₙ₋₂Hₙ (e.g. C₂B₁₀H₁₂) |
| Nido | BₙHₙ₊₄ | C₂Bₙ₋₂Hₙ₊₂ |
| Arachno | BₙHₙ₊₆ | C₂Bₙ₋₂Hₙ₊₄ |
✅ Solved Example 15.5
C₂B₉H₁₂⁻: → B₁₁H₁₄⁻ → B₁₁H₁₄⁻ – 3H⁺ = B₁₁H₁₁⁴⁻ → Nido
C₂B₇H₁₃: → B₉H₁₅ → B₉H₁₅ – 6H⁺ = B₉H₉⁶⁻ → Arachno
C₄B₂H₆: → B₆H₁₀ → B₆H₁₀ – 4H⁺ = B₆H₆⁴⁻ → Nido
C₂B₇H₁₃: → B₉H₁₅ → B₉H₁₅ – 6H⁺ = B₉H₉⁶⁻ → Arachno
C₄B₂H₆: → B₆H₁₀ → B₆H₁₀ – 4H⁺ = B₆H₆⁴⁻ → Nido
🔬 Heteroborane Conversion Rules
| Heteroatom | Replace with |
|---|---|
| C, Si, Ge, Sn | BH |
| N, P, As | BH₂ |
| S, Se | BH₃ |
✅ Solved Example 15.6
SB₉H₁₁: S→BH₃ → B₁₀H₁₄ → B₁₀H₁₄ – 4H⁺ = B₁₀H₁₀⁴⁻ → Nido
CPB₁₀H₁₁: C→BH, P→BH₂ → PB₁₁H₁₂ → B₁₂H₁₄ → B₁₂H₁₄ – 2H⁺ = B₁₂H₁₂²⁻ → Closo
CPB₁₀H₁₁: C→BH, P→BH₂ → PB₁₁H₁₂ → B₁₂H₁₄ → B₁₂H₁₄ – 2H⁺ = B₁₂H₁₂²⁻ → Closo
⚙️ 15.4.3 — Metallaboranes (M replaces BH)
| Organometallic Fragment | Valence e⁻ | Equivalent BHₓ |
|---|---|---|
| Mn(CO)₃ | 13 | B (boron alone) |
| Co(η⁵-Cp) | 14 | BH |
| Co(CO)₃ | 15 | BH₂ |
| Fe(CO)₄ | 16 | BH₃ |
✅ Solved Example 15.7
B₄H₆(CoCp)₂: Each CoCp(14e⁻) → BH → B₄H₆(BH)₂ = B₆H₈ → B₆H₈ – 2H⁺ = B₆H₆²⁻ → Closo
B₃H₇[Fe(CO)₃]₂: Each Fe(CO)₃(16e⁻) → BH₃? No — wait, BH uses 4e⁻ toward 8, so Fe(CO)₃ is 2e⁻ short → BH. So: B₃H₇(BH)₂ = B₅H₉ → B₅H₉ – 4H⁺ = B₅H₅⁴⁻ → Nido
B₃H₇[Fe(CO)₃]₂: Each Fe(CO)₃(16e⁻) → BH₃? No — wait, BH uses 4e⁻ toward 8, so Fe(CO)₃ is 2e⁻ short → BH. So: B₃H₇(BH)₂ = B₅H₉ → B₅H₉ – 4H⁺ = B₅H₅⁴⁻ → Nido
📊 Table 15.10 — Closo Metallaborane/Metallacarborane Structures
| Skeletal Atoms | Shape | Example 1 | Example 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Octahedron | B₄H₆(CoCp)₂ | C₂B₃H₅Fe(CO)₃ |
| 7 | Pentagonal bipyramid | C₂B₄H₆Ni(PPh₃)₂ | C₂B₃H₅(CoCp)₂ |
| 8 | Dodecahedron | C₂B₄H₄[(CH₃)₂Sn]CoCp | — |
| 9 | Capped sq. antiprism | C₂B₆H₈Pt(PMe₃)₂ | C₂B₅H₇(CoCp)₂ |
| 10 | Bicapped sq. antiprism | [B₉H₉NiCp]⁻ | CB₇H₈(CoCp)(NiCp) |
| 12 | Icosahedron | C₂B₇H₉(CoCp)₃ | C₂B₉H₁₁Ru(CO)₃ |
💡 Carborane-ferrocene analog: C₂B₉H₁₁²⁻ (nido) has p-orbital lobe at missing vertex → exactly like Cp⁻ ring! → [Fe(η⁵-C₂B₉H₁₁)₂]²⁻ = carboranyl ferrocene
⚗️ 15.4.4 — Carbonyl Clusters & Wade's Rules (Transition Metals)
Key Rule: Transition metal has 5 more valence orbitals than B → needs 10 more electrons per atom for framework equivalency.
So: B₆H₆²⁻ has 26 valence e⁻ (closo) → Co₆ analog needs 26 + 6×10 = 86 e⁻
→ Co₆(CO)₁₆ = 86e⁻ → closo octahedral!
So: B₆H₆²⁻ has 26 valence e⁻ (closo) → Co₆ analog needs 26 + 6×10 = 86 e⁻
→ Co₆(CO)₁₆ = 86e⁻ → closo octahedral!
📊 Table 15.11 — Electron Counting for Main Group vs Transition Metal Clusters
| Structure Type | Main Group | Transition Metal |
|---|---|---|
| Closo | 4n+2 | 14n+2 |
| Nido | 4n+4 | 14n+4 |
| Arachno | 4n+6 | 14n+6 |
| Hypho | 4n+8 | 14n+8 |
📊 Table 15.12 — Borane & TM Cluster Parallels
| n | Parent vertices | FBP | Closo B | Nido B | Arachno B | Closo TM | Nido TM | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 22 | 24 | 26 | 72 | 74 | Os₅(CO)₁₆(closo) / Os₅C(CO)₁₅(nido) |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 26 | 28 | 30 | 86 | 88 | Co₆(CO)₁₆(closo) / Os₆(CO)₁₇[P(OMe)₃]₃(nido) |
| 4 | — | 5 | — | — | 22 | — | 60 | Co₄(CO)₁₂(nido by count, but actually tetrahedral — exception!) |
🔴 Exception to Wade's Rules: M₄(CO)₁₂ (M = Co, Rh, Ir) — 60 e⁻ (= 14n+4 → predicted nido = trigonal bipyramid missing 1 vertex), but X-ray shows tetrahedral metal core! Wade's rules not always correct for TM clusters.
📊 Table 15.13 — Clusters with 7 Metal–Metal Framework Bond Pairs
| Framework atoms | Type | Shape | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Capped closo | Capped octahedron | [Rh₇(CO)₁₆]³⁻, Os₇(CO)₂₁ |
| 6 | Closo | Octahedron | Rh₆(CO)₁₆, Ru₆C(CO)₁₇ |
| 5 | Nido | Square pyramid | Ru₅C(CO)₁₅ |
| 4 | Arachno | Butterfly | [Fe₄(CO)₁₃H]⁻ |
🧊 15.4.5 — Carbon-Centered (Carbide) Clusters
Encapsulated C contributes its 4 valence e⁻ to the cluster count.
Example: Ru₆C(CO)₁₇ — C contributes 4e⁻ → total = 86e⁻ → closo (octahedral Ru₆ core)
Symmetry analysis (Oh):
• C(2s) = A₁g symmetry
• C(2p) = T₁u symmetry
• Match with Ru₆ framework orbitals of A₁g & T₁u → 4 C–Ru bonding pairs formed
• T₂g Ru orbitals → Ru–Ru bonding only (no C interaction)
Example: Ru₆C(CO)₁₇ — C contributes 4e⁻ → total = 86e⁻ → closo (octahedral Ru₆ core)
Symmetry analysis (Oh):
• C(2s) = A₁g symmetry
• C(2p) = T₁u symmetry
• Match with Ru₆ framework orbitals of A₁g & T₁u → 4 C–Ru bonding pairs formed
• T₂g Ru orbitals → Ru–Ru bonding only (no C interaction)
📐 mno Rule — Extended Wade's Rules
For closed cluster: Total framework pairs = m + n + o (+ p for open)
• m = number of condensed (linked) polyhedra
• n = total number of vertices
• o = single-atom bridges between polyhedra
• p = missing vertices (1 for nido, 2 for arachno)
• m = number of condensed (linked) polyhedra
• n = total number of vertices
• o = single-atom bridges between polyhedra
• p = missing vertices (1 for nido, 2 for arachno)
✅ Solved Example 15.9
B₁₂H₁₂²⁻: m=1, n=12, o=0, p=0 → m+n+o = 13 pairs ✓
[(η⁵-C₂B₉H₁₁)₂Fe]²⁻: m=2, n=23 (all C,B,Fe), o=1 (Fe bridges), p=0 → 26 pairs
Ferrocene (η⁵-Cp)₂Fe: m=2, n=11, o=1, p=2 (nido each ring) → 16 pairs
[(η⁵-C₂B₉H₁₁)₂Fe]²⁻: m=2, n=23 (all C,B,Fe), o=1 (Fe bridges), p=0 → 26 pairs
Ferrocene (η⁵-Cp)₂Fe: m=2, n=11, o=1, p=2 (nido each ring) → 16 pairs
🌍 Zintl Ions (Main Group Clusters)
Ionic clusters of main group elements — classified by same 4n+2, 4n+4, 4n+6 rules:
- Pb₅²⁻: 5×4+2 = 22 = 4×5+2 → Closo
- Sn₉⁴⁻: 9×4+4 = 40 = 4×9+4 → Nido
- Sb₄²⁻: 5×4+2=22=4×4+6 → Arachno (square, octahedron –2 vertices)
✅ Solved Example 15.8
a. Pb₅²⁻: 5×4+2 = 22; 4n+2 with n=5 → Closo
b. Sn₉⁴⁻: 9×4+4 = 40; 4n+4 with n=9 → Nido (1 missing vertex)
c. Sb₄²⁻: 5×4+2=22; 4n+6 with n=4 → Arachno (square = octahedron –2)
b. Sn₉⁴⁻: 9×4+4 = 40; 4n+4 with n=9 → Nido (1 missing vertex)
c. Sb₄²⁻: 5×4+2=22; 4n+6 with n=4 → Arachno (square = octahedron –2)
🎯 Exam Tips & Must-Remember Points
🔴 TOP PICKS for GATE/CSIR-NET/IIT-JAM:
- Table 15.3 (Isolobal fragments) — memorize completely!
- Quadruple bond in [Re₂Cl₈]²⁻ — mechanism, color, geometry
- Wade's rules Table 15.11 — 4n+2/14n+2 formulas
- Heteroatom conversion for classification (S→BH₃, N→BH₂, C→BH)
- mno rule for polyhedral clusters
⚡ Quick Formula Sheet:
- Closo BₙHₙ²⁻ → total e⁻ = 4n+2
- Nido BₙHₙ₊₄ → total e⁻ = 4n+4
- Arachno BₙHₙ₊₆ → total e⁻ = 4n+6
- TM closo: 14n+2 | nido: 14n+4 | arachno: 14n+6
- Replace each TM → 10 extra electrons vs B in cluster
- FSR < 1 means multiple bond; smaller = stronger bond
⚠️ Common MCQ Traps:
- HCo(CO)₄ is a strong acid like HCl — but slightly soluble in water
- M₄(CO)₁₂ predicted nido BUT actually tetrahedral — exception!
- Fe(CO)₅ is NOT isolobal with CH₄ — both filled shells but different geometry
- [Os₂Cl₈]²⁻ has 10d electrons → triple bond → staggered geometry (not eclipsed like quadruple)
- δ bond is WEAKEST — that's why complexes are colored (small δ→δ* gap)
- Quintuple bond controversy: bond order calculations give 3.3 to 5 range
📝 Practice MCQs (Based on This Chapter)
Q1. Which of the following is called a "pseudohalogen"?
(A) Fe(CO)₄ (B) Co(CO)₄ (C) Mn(CO)₅ (D) Ni(CO)₄
Ans: (B) — 17e⁻ species, one short of 18e⁻, just like halogen is one short of octet
(A) Fe(CO)₄ (B) Co(CO)₄ (C) Mn(CO)₅ (D) Ni(CO)₄
Ans: (B) — 17e⁻ species, one short of 18e⁻, just like halogen is one short of octet
Q2. CH₂ is isolobal with which organometallic complex?
(A) Mn(CO)₅ (B) Fe(CO)₄ (C) Co(CO)₃ (D) Cr(CO)₆
Ans: (B) — Both 2 vertices short; CH₂ (6e⁻) ↔ Fe(CO)₄ (16e⁻)
(A) Mn(CO)₅ (B) Fe(CO)₄ (C) Co(CO)₃ (D) Cr(CO)₆
Ans: (B) — Both 2 vertices short; CH₂ (6e⁻) ↔ Fe(CO)₄ (16e⁻)
Q3. What is the total valence electron count for closo Os₅(CO)₁₆?
(A) 60 (B) 72 (C) 74 (D) 86
Ans: (B) — 14n+2 = 14×5+2 = 72
(A) 60 (B) 72 (C) 74 (D) 86
Ans: (B) — 14n+2 = 14×5+2 = 72
Q4. [Re₂Cl₈]²⁻ is eclipsed due to:
(A) σ bond (B) π bond (C) δ bond (D) steric repulsion
Ans: (C) — δ bond locks the eclipsed D₄ₕ geometry
(A) σ bond (B) π bond (C) δ bond (D) steric repulsion
Ans: (C) — δ bond locks the eclipsed D₄ₕ geometry
Q5. Classify B₁₀H₁₄ by Wade's rules.
(A) Closo (B) Nido (C) Arachno (D) Hypho
Ans: (B) — B₁₀H₁₄ – 4H⁺ = B₁₀H₁₀⁴⁻ → Nido
(A) Closo (B) Nido (C) Arachno (D) Hypho
Ans: (B) — B₁₀H₁₄ – 4H⁺ = B₁₀H₁₀⁴⁻ → Nido
Q6. Which molecule is the carbon-free metallocene?
(A) [Fe(C₂B₉H₁₁)₂]²⁻ (B) [(P₅)₂Ti]²⁻ (C) (Cp)₂Fe (D) [Ir(CO)₃]₄
Ans: (B) — Contains only P₅ rings, no carbon ligands
(A) [Fe(C₂B₉H₁₁)₂]²⁻ (B) [(P₅)₂Ti]²⁻ (C) (Cp)₂Fe (D) [Ir(CO)₃]₄
Ans: (B) — Contains only P₅ rings, no carbon ligands
Q7. The shortest metal-metal bond ever recorded is:
(A) Re–Re in [Re₂Cl₈]²⁻ (B) Mo–Mo quintuple (C) Cr–Cr = 172.9 pm (2009) (D) W–W in [W₂Cl₉]³⁻
Ans: (C) — Guanidinate Cr(I) complex, FSR = 0.729
(A) Re–Re in [Re₂Cl₈]²⁻ (B) Mo–Mo quintuple (C) Cr–Cr = 172.9 pm (2009) (D) W–W in [W₂Cl₉]³⁻
Ans: (C) — Guanidinate Cr(I) complex, FSR = 0.729
Q8. mno rule: For ferrocene (Cp)₂Fe, number of framework e⁻ pairs =?
(A) 13 (B) 14 (C) 16 (D) 26
Ans: (C) — m=2, n=11, o=1, p=2 → 16 pairs
(A) 13 (B) 14 (C) 16 (D) 26
Ans: (C) — m=2, n=11, o=1, p=2 → 16 pairs
Chapter 15 Notes · Inorganic Chemistry · All competitive exams · Made with ❤️
You May Also Like
Loading...
